for medical writers
The first draft that survives review.
Hand a client a PRISMA-compliant synthesis with GRADE-rated findings and citations checked against Retraction Watch. The methodology block writes itself; you spend your time on the science.
The problem with consumer search for medical writing
- Elicit and Consensus surface relevant abstracts, but the output is a feed, not a draft. You still rewrite it into PRISMA structure manually.
- Citation rigor varies wildly. A 2023 retraction surfaces in your draft because the underlying tool didn't check Retraction Watch.
- No reproducibility log means when a client asks 'why did you cite this and not that,' you don't have a defensible answer.
- Generic AI writers produce 'expert tone' prose without methodology — every finding looks equally confident regardless of evidence quality.
What Embarke does instead
PRISMA 2020 section structure out of the box
The Writer agent renders under the published PRISMA section list (Rationale, Objectives, Eligibility, Methods, Selection, Data items, RoB, Certainty, Results, Discussion, Limitations, Implications). Auto-generated flow diagram embedded under Study Selection.
GRADE certainty on every finding
The Calibrator agent runs the published 5-domain GRADE framework (risk of bias / inconsistency / indirectness / imprecision / publication bias) per finding. H / M / L / Very-Low ratings appear inline next to the claim, summarized in the Certainty section.
Retraction-aware before you cite
Every DOI runs through Crossref's Retraction Watch enrichment. Flagged papers earn an inline RETRACTED badge in the draft, a top-of-report banner, and a critical Critic issue that blocks Writer approval unless the retraction is acknowledged in context.
Methodology stamp + reproducibility ZIP
Every Markdown / DOCX / PDF export opens with framework + sources + retraction-count + prompt hash. The exportable ZIP is a SHA-256-signed package: manifest, full source list, BibTeX, RIS. Defensible when a client asks 'why this citation.'
A typical medical-writer workflow
Sign up free → paste your research question → pick the PRISMA 2020 systematic review template → wait ~3–8 minutes for Scout / Analyst / Writer / Critic / Calibrator → review the draft inline → export to DOCX with the methodology stamp. The first three syntheses a month are on the Free tier; Plus unlocks unlimited briefs at $39/mo.
Draft a review free
Free tier — three syntheses, no credit card. BYOK for the LLM so your costs stay on your account.